so when are the cern gonna be achieving the finale stuff...?

hi Vedaveron,

... it is a very very very big number 1 followed by 43 zero's!"

>>I always wondered what the limits were to mans understandings to date... Where do these numbers come from? Just curious because I could use these numbers in theory... <<

The answer to this is interesting… the numbers come from that which some call ‘revelation’ …I see it differently but anyway five years ago I was working on an environmental model…and I fell into a rabbit hole.. it took me on a journey to Pakistan Kashmir… you can read the story if you chose here … www.scribd.com/doc/137828...ov-Revision


What is important to note is the numbers were ‘revealed’.. at the time of the awakening and whilst I was aware of the first three in the bronze mean sequence (1 4 13).. the 43 was revealed and the discovery of the numbers as an integer sequence was accidental ..an event that occurred a year later… similarly I only leaned that this sequence is called the bronze mean earlier this year… in many respects a complete ignorance of mathematics and spirituality was to my benefit.. I was open, unbiased. Like putty to the Lights!

One thing to point out is whilst the sequence extends in theory beyond 43… in practice it doesn’t.. it is all down to the generation of 3 hyper spatial dimensions in this step.. in the previous steps a single dimension is generated (+1) but at 43… 4 are created… this is what is special…this is the loop…. More on this at malcolm.mcewen.googlepages.com/th...ion

One thing to note… this stuff is now 3 years plus old… I have learned/deduced/assumed a lot since then and still trying to unravel it yet! If you bore yaself wid all that I write and animate… bear in mind the dates.. they are very relevant and part of the story.. I share as I see… but it is veiled.. it is unpleasant to look…(one of the reasons why most of the work has been put together in India.. where I am allowed to dive into the hole.....

>>It's sort of like man "dating" the universe...(grin)...
The horizon problem...
OUR universe appears to be unfathomably uniform. Look across space from one edge of the visible universe to the other, and you'll see that the microwave background radiation filling the cosmos is at the same temperature everywhere. That may not seem surprising until you consider that the two edges are nearly 28 billion light years apart and our universe is only 14 billion years old. <<

But explainable by fracturing… go back to the beginning and the universe is a uniform unit of one… it fractures into two.. then four, eight etc….. each fracture is now a unit in its own right but inherits a property from the original state… similarly be careful about what you read as astronomical/physical fact… it is all theory.. no one not even Armstrong and crew has ever left the gravitational influence of the Earth.. maths includes a branch called Statistics and as one of the USA’s founding fathers noted.. there are lies, damn lies and statistics… numbers, particularly the linear kind we use do lie… especially at the extremes… theory and practice are quite different.

>>You see, Man can see in one direction for 14 billion light years, so he dates the universe as being 14 billion years old yet he can look in the other direction for the same distance, so across our universe is a total of 28 billion light years, At least! This doesn't say that the universe is 14 OR 28 billion years old, all it says is, that our sight is limited to the 14 billion light years in any direction (it's a limit in the way we can percieve light)... Our galaxy is traveling in one direction and as soon as we travel one light year we can still see that 14 billion light years so I suggest that even if we went to the edge of the universe(14 billion light years away) we could still see 14 billion light years in any direction!... <<

Yes! Because there is only one ‘real time’ and it is the one you personally experience.. as it is the one I personally experience… we are on a ‘flat sphere’ it has no edge only horizons but it is centred on you as it is centred on me..

Summation: Man is wrong in his dating of the universe! Plain and simple... In a fractal universe this account for infinity that continues on in a fractal wave. Thus matter always existed and will never be destroyed which leads to the conclusion of the infinitely small and the infinitely large dimentions that continue on into infinity through this fractal realm... We are but atoms that have existed for a very long time that are very, very old and they have come together now as us, new, very young living beings and conscious of ourself, we are the universe becomming conscious of itself.

Yes and no…. I agree that our dating of the universe is wrong because of our continuing belief that it is linear and uniform despite the scientific experiments with atomic clocks and airplanes that show otherwise…

No because it is not infinite… at the smallest scale the universe makes a particular pattern/shape…. It similarly makes a pattern at the largest… in both cases the pattern is identical… this is the loop.. thus it is not infinite but recursive… we can only explore between the two points… this is finite… but from the quark to the universe its as near an infinite finite as you could wish for…

>>As with your measurement, I want to calculate what the possible harmonics of the speed of light would be in a smaller/or larger universe and come up with an experiment to change the thoughts of mans percieved ideas of the big bang theory(challenge this theory)... If there is a mathmatical calculation to the theory, it'll be the next big thing in physics. <<

Agreed… find it !! … in this respect I would recommend seeking out a book by Brigdeman “(1927) who argued against establishing rules of reasoning regarding the observations that were being made in the new field of Quantum mechanics. In his book,” the logic of modern physics” Bridgeman concluded that "it is possible to analyze nature into correlations without. . . any assumption whatever as to the character of those correlations," and he argues that to go beyond empirical correlation into the realm of hypotheses of reasons for them is to "prejudice the future".

This is very much the case with modern physics… all researchers, students etc without exception are victims of this (and many other) prejudice… just a point but I discovered this reference when researching problems in soil classification… it should be noted I am not a physicist .. I’m a soil scientist by training and it is the multi-disciplinary aspect of soil science that led me on this road….

>>A harmonics of light speed would also answer many a question and also allow for the possibility of "faster" than light travel! It would answer the question of "where the light goes in a black hole"...

In otherwords, if I can prove a harmonics of light speed to be 10*-17m going into a black hole, then what the light is doing is transposing into a smaller dimension, thus, the light doesn't escape the black hole but is instead reduced through harmonics into a faster speed of light into a smaller dimension and throught this exchange the Hawkins radiation that is emitted from a black hole is the equal and opposite reaction of feeding our universe matter of an equal and opposite reaction, thus the law of motion is preserved.

See, things will make more sense in mathmatical terms if I can prove this scientifically through a mathmatical formula... <<

Agreed in terms of getting wider acceptance however not necessary to exploit it.. it is rather like moving your arm.. you don’t know the precise mechanisms and the mathematics associated with the action but this lack of knowledge doesn’t prevent you from picking your nose .. likewise not being able to express the universe or part of it in terms of mathematics doesn’t prevent you from entering Paradise…. God is not an elitist who populates heaven with Nobel prize winners… He/She/It just wants you balanced… hence the trinity (Devotion, Compassion, Pacifism.. see my google pages for a full transcript of the three pillars.. the first ‘revelation’ (I so wish there was another less pompous term to describe this event)

If there were a hundred billion tiny universes in one atom that was in one grain of sand then this would more than make up the differece of the missing "Dark Matter"... It's not missing, it's just so small you can't realize its existance in the dimention it's in.

No I think dark matter is far easier to explain… it is detailed (well elaborated..) in the web pages and in the lesson of the lights video.. Dark matter represents approx 7/8 of the universes matter…. This can be explained through quantum spin… give it direction and three quarks can make 8 kinds of matter (2 x 2 x2) .. but only matter with quarks of the same spin interact… if you live in a universe with dual spin you can work this out but two combinations (manifestations) only have spin in one direction… we likely live in one of these two universes.. we do not experience opposite spin.. we will never identify it experimentally but it is there…..

Finally… sorry about the length of this post… hope it clarifies.. gives food for thought……

Regards

GM23

www.sign69.com/medialoung...ce1235.html

sadly there is a limit orpheus...

a point at which you no longer have worms... you may not have found it but go down deep enough or up high enough and you will find a limit...

as I said in the earlier post the distance between these two points is vast... 43 orders of magnitude... but whilst from a given perspective it appears infinite in practice it is not.... the limit has two boundaries..... the first is determined by you... it is your cognitive limitation.. as it is similarly mine.... the other is it's actual limitation..... but it is the first that one encounters and cannot pass....

just because you can add 1 to a number infinitely, at least in theory... does not mean you cannot do it in practice.. even if you begun counting at the start of the big bang and passed the task onto another prior to death your descendent would still not have reached very far.... you can estimate how far ....

assume it takes 6 secs to write a number.. ten in a min.. 600/hr... 14400 a day.... 5256000 a year x 13 billion (approx age of universe) and you or your current heir has reached 5256,000,000,000,000,000 or 5.256 x 10(17)... far short of infinity.....

this is one of the problems of our numbers systems... they extend into absurdity... and trying to understand the universe beyond the points numbers really exist throws up paradoxes... hence the quest for the god particle... the theorisation of something that cannot exist in our reality... the limit of fracture beyond which all that holds true in this universe falls apart....

it is something one has to realize...

either you can or you haven't thought about it long enough..

regsrds

gm23